|
Post by Knud on Jan 30, 2004 7:05:48 GMT -5
I just noticed what was the problem with my server (i.e. none like it) it was a 1.0 one tweaked. I just got rune initial version for linux and then cheated that into believe it was a hov one. Problems: it has bugs inherent to first version and comboing doesnt work fine (Egil opened my eyes on this). So by now im preparing 2 workarounds: 1 - The obvious one: Im dling the hov version for linux 2 - The meanwhile weird one: Im setting up a vmware windows xp virtual machine where ill place the rune server. Meanwhile the (1) is still in progress ill test the second choice, Ill try to fire that server up this evening... So if you ever have the time go and test it "speed, comboing... etc" as im not sure how vmware will perform Note: for those who dont really know what "vmware" is; its a tool for having virtual machines inside a machine (like having another PC inside your pc) like you could have another windows inside your windows box. Im not sure if i made myself clear. Anyway www.vmware.com (It's not free)
|
|
|
Post by Efreet on Jan 30, 2004 7:48:51 GMT -5
remember, XP!!!
|
|
|
Post by Egil on Jan 30, 2004 11:28:08 GMT -5
I just noticed what was the problem with my server (i.e. none like it) it was a 1.0 one tweaked. I just got rune initial version for linux and then cheated that into believe it was a hov one. Problems: it has bugs inherent to first version and comboing doesnt work fine (Egil opened my eyes on this). I did? What the fuck ;D Yet another thing I don't remember anything about.
|
|
|
Post by Knud on Jan 30, 2004 12:28:36 GMT -5
In gods name, right youre right egil; i cant discern whats true from what was true
|
|
|
Post by Knud on Feb 1, 2004 10:50:00 GMT -5
Argh fuck it natting wont work fine between the internet world and my virtual machine , i guess i have to wait for hov to be downloaded, sorry about the spam
|
|